Cloud Provider
Azure Reservations
Inefficiency Type
Clear filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Showing
1234
out of
1234
inefficiencis
Filter
:
Filter
x
Missing Shared Scope Configuration for Azure Reservations
Compute
Cloud Provider
Azure
Service Name
Azure Reservations
Inefficiency Type
Suboptimal Configuration

When reservations are scoped only to a single subscription, any unused capacity cannot be applied to matching resources in other subscriptions within the same tenant. This leads to underutilization of the committed reservation and continued on-demand charges in other parts of the organization. Enabling **Shared scope** allows all eligible subscriptions to consume the reservation benefit, improving utilization and reducing overall spend. This is particularly impactful in environments with decentralized provisioning, such as across dev/test/prod subscriptions or multiple business units.

Underutilized Azure Reserved Instance Due to Workload Drift
Compute
Cloud Provider
Azure
Service Name
Azure Reservations
Inefficiency Type
Commitment Misalignment

As workloads evolve, Azure Reserved Instances (RIs) may no longer align with actual usage — due to refactoring, region changes, autoscaling, or instance-type drift. When this happens, the committed usage goes unused, while new workloads run on non-covered SKUs, resulting in both underutilized reservations and full-price on-demand charges elsewhere.

The root inefficiency is architectural or operational drift away from what was originally committed — often due to team autonomy, poor RI governance, or legacy commitments. This leads to silent waste unless workloads are re-aligned to match existing reservations.

There are no inefficiency matches the current filters.