Suboptimal ElastiCache Engine Selection
Yulia Perlis
Service Category
Database
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS ElastiCache
Inefficiency Type
Suboptimal Configuration
Explanation

Many workloads default to using Redis or Memcached without evaluating whether a lighter or more efficient engine would provide equivalent functionality at lower cost. Valkey is a Redis-compatible, open-source engine supported by ElastiCache that may offer improved price-performance and licensing benefits. For read-heavy or stateless workloads that don’t require Redis-specific features (e.g., persistence, advanced replication), Valkey can often be used as a drop-in replacement. Memcached, while simple, lacks key features like replication and persistence, and may be less cost-effective for certain access patterns. Choosing the wrong engine can result in overpaying for capabilities that aren’t needed — or missing opportunities to optimize.

Relevant Billing Model

ElastiCache is billed per instance-hour based on instance type and engine. While pricing is nominally similar across engines, performance and resource efficiency may vary significantly depending on workload and engine selection.

Detection
  • Review the engine type for each ElastiCache cluster (Redis, Memcached, Valkey)
  • Identify Redis clusters that don’t use features like persistence, pub/sub, or complex data types
  • Evaluate whether Valkey would be a compatible and more efficient replacement
  • Assess historical reasons for engine choice (e.g., legacy defaults vs. actual workload needs)
Remediation
  • For Redis-compatible but non-persistent workloads, consider migrating to Valkey
  • If using Memcached, reevaluate whether Redis or Valkey offers better price-performance
  • Note that engine migration typically requires cluster recreation and data migration — plan accordingly
  • Incorporate engine selection as part of architecture reviews for new cache deployments
Relevant Documentation