Convertible Reserved Instances provide valuable pricing flexibility — but that flexibility is often underused. When EC2 workloads shift across instance families or OS types, the original RI may no longer apply to active usage. If the RI is not converted, the customer continues paying for unused commitment despite having the ability to adapt it.
Because conversion is a manual process and requires matching or exceeding the original RI’s value, many organizations fail to optimize their coverage. Over time, this leads to growing pools of ineffective RIs that could have been aligned to real workloads.
Many organizations default to Intel-based EC2 instances due to familiarity or assumptions about workload compatibility. However, AWS offers AMD and Graviton-based alternatives that often deliver significantly better price-performance for general-purpose and compute-optimized workloads.
By not testing workloads across available architectures, teams may continue paying a premium for Intel instances even when no specific performance or compatibility benefit exists. Over time, this results in unnecessary compute spend across development, staging, and even production environments.
Underutilized Snowflake warehouses occur when a workload is assigned a larger warehouse size than necessary. For example, a workload that could efficiently execute on a Medium (M) warehouse may be running on a Large (L) or Extra Large (XL) warehouse.This leads to unnecessary credit consumption without a proportional benefit to performance. Underutilization is often driven by early provisioning decisions that were not later reassessed, or by a desire for marginal speed improvements that do not justify the increased operational cost.
Inefficient execution of repeated queries occurs when common query patterns are frequently executed without optimization. Even if individual executions are successful, repeated inefficiencies compound overall compute consumption and credit costs.
By analyzing Snowflake's parameterized query metrics, organizations can identify top repeated queries and optimize them for better performance, resource usage, and cost-efficiency.
If auto-suspend settings are too high, warehouses can sit idle and continue accruing unnecessary charges. Tightening the auto-suspend window ensures that the warehouse shuts down quickly once queries complete, minimizing credit waste while maintaining acceptable user experience (e.g., caching needs, interactive performance).
If no appropriate query timeout is configured, inefficient or runaway queries can execute for extended periods (up to the default 2-day system limit). For as long as the query is running, the warehouse will remain active and accrue costs. Proper timeout settings help terminate inefficient queries, free up compute capacity, and allow the warehouse to become idle sooner, making it eligible for auto-suspend once the inactivity timer is reached.
Many organizations assign separate Snowflake warehouses to individual business units or teams to simplify chargebacks and operational ownership. This often results in redundant and underutilized warehouses, as workloads frequently do not require the full capacity of even the smallest warehouse size.
By consolidating compatible workloads onto shared warehouses, organizations can maximize utilization, reduce idle runtime across the fleet, and significantly lower total credit consumption. Cost allocation can still be achieved using Query Billing Attribution.
When ECS clusters are configured with an Auto Scaling Group that maintains a minimum number of EC2 instances (e.g., min = 1 or higher), the instances remain active even when there are no tasks scheduled. This leads to idle compute capacity and unnecessary EC2 charges.Instead, ECS Capacity Providers support target tracking scaling policies that can scale the ASG to zero when idle and automatically increase capacity when new tasks or services are scheduled. Failing to adopt this pattern results in persistent idle infrastructure and unnecessary costs in ECS environments that do not require always-on compute.
Development and test environments on Compute Engine are commonly provisioned and left running around the clock, even if only used during business hours. This results in wasteful spend on compute time that could be eliminated by scheduling shutdowns during idle periods. GCP enables scheduling via native tools such as Cloud Scheduler, Cloud Functions, or Terraform automation. Stopping VMs during off-hours preserves boot disks and instance metadata while halting compute billing.
Non-production EC2 instances are often provisioned for daytime-only usage but remain running 24/7 out of convenience or oversight. This results in unnecessary compute charges, even if the workload is inactive for 16+ hours per day. AWS supports automated schedules to stop and start instances at predefined times, allowing organizations to retain data and instance configuration without paying for unused runtime. Implementing a shutdown schedule for inactive periods (e.g., nights, weekends) can reduce compute costs by up to 60% in typical non-prod environments.
