Cloud Provider
Service Name
Inefficiency Type
Clear filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Showing
1234
out of
1234
inefficiencies
Filter
:
Filter
x
Misuse of Aurora Serverless for Steady-State Workloads
Databases
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Aurora
Inefficiency Type
Suboptimal Deployment Model

Aurora Serverless is designed for workloads with unpredictable or intermittent usage patterns that benefit from automatic scaling. However, when used for databases with constant load, the service’s elasticity offers little advantage and adds cost overhead. Serverless instances run continuously in steady workloads, resulting in persistent ACU billing at a higher effective rate than a provisioned cluster of similar size. In addition, Serverless configurations cannot use Reserved Instances or Savings Plans, missing out on predictable cost reductions available to provisioned Aurora.

Pipeline Breaks from Outdated Dependency Images in Dataflow
Compute
Cloud Provider
GCP
Service Name
GCP Dataflow
Inefficiency Type
Operational Overhead from Custom Image Maintenance

In restricted or isolated network environments, Dataflow workers often cannot reach the public internet to download runtime dependencies. To operate securely, organizations build custom worker images that bundle required libraries. However, these images must be manually updated to keep dependencies current. As upstream packages evolve, outdated internal images can cause pipeline errors, execution delays, or total job failures. Each failure wastes worker runtime, increases troubleshooting time, and leads to rebuild cycles that inflate operational and compute costs.

Outdated Aurora Versions Triggering Extended Support Charges
Databases
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Aurora
Inefficiency Type
Outdated Engine Version

Customers often delay upgrading Aurora clusters due to compatibility concerns or operational overhead. However, when older versions such as MySQL 5.7 or PostgreSQL 11 move into Extended Support, AWS applies automatic surcharges to ensure continued patching. These charges affect all clusters regardless of usage, creating unnecessary cost exposure across both production and non-production environments. For large Aurora fleets, the incremental expense can become significant if upgrades are not proactively managed.

Outdated RDS Versions Triggering Extended Support Charges
Databases
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS RDS
Inefficiency Type
Outdated Engine Version

Many organizations continue to run outdated database engines, such as MySQL 5.7 or PostgreSQL 11, beyond their support windows. Beginning in 2024, AWS automatically enrolls these into Extended Support to maintain security updates, adding incremental charges that scale with vCPU count. These costs often appear suddenly, impacting both production and non-production environments. For development and test databases in particular, the charges may outweigh their value, leading to hidden inefficiencies if not addressed promptly.

Unnecessary Costs from Unused Lambda Versions with SnapStart
Compute
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Lambda
Inefficiency Type
Version Sprawl

Many teams publish new Lambda versions frequently (e.g., through CI/CD pipelines) but do not clean up old ones. When SnapStart is enabled, each of these versions retains an active snapshot in the cache, generating ongoing charges. Over time, accumulated unused versions can significantly increase spend without delivering any business value. This problem compounds in environments with high deployment velocity or many functions.

Inefficient SnapStart Configuration in Lambda
Compute
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Lambda
Inefficiency Type
Misconfigured Performance Optimization

SnapStart reduces cold-start latency, but when configured inefficiently, it can increase costs. High-traffic workloads can trigger frequent snapshot restorations, multiplying costs. Slow initialization code inflates the Init phase, which is now billed at the full rate. Suppressed-init conditions, where functions initialize without enhanced resources, can add further inefficiency if memory or timeout settings are misaligned. Together, these factors can cause SnapStart to deliver higher spend without proportional benefit.

Unexpired Non-Current Object Versions in S3
Storage
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS S3
Inefficiency Type
Missing Lifecycle Policy

When S3 versioning is enabled but no lifecycle rules are defined for non-current objects, outdated versions accumulate indefinitely. These non-current versions are rarely accessed but continue to incur storage charges. Over time, this leads to significant hidden costs, particularly in buckets with frequent object updates or automated data pipelines. Proper lifecycle management is required to limit or expire obsolete versions.

Suboptimal Use of EFS Storage Classes
Storage
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS EFS
Inefficiency Type
Misaligned Storage Tiering

Many organizations default to storing all EFS data in the Standard class, regardless of how frequently data is accessed. This results in inefficient spend for workloads with significant portions of data that are rarely read. EFS IA and Archive tiers offer lower-cost alternatives for data with low or near-zero access, while Intelligent Tiering can automate placement decisions. Failing to leverage these options wastes storage spend and reduces cost efficiency.

Excessive AWS Config Costs from Spot Instances
Other
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Config
Inefficiency Type
Over-Recording of Ephemeral Resources

Spot Instances are designed to be short-lived, with frequent interruptions and replacements. When AWS Config continuously records every lifecycle change for these instances, it produces a large number of CIRs. This drives costs significantly higher without delivering meaningful compliance insight, since Spot Instances are typically stateless and non-critical. In environments with heavy Spot usage, Config costs can balloon and exceed the value of tracking these transient resources.

Unmanaged Growth of Athena Query Output Buckets
Compute
Cloud Provider
AWS
Service Name
AWS Athena
Inefficiency Type
Missing Lifecycle Policy

Athena generates a new S3 object for every query result, regardless of whether the output is needed long term. Over time, this leads to uncontrolled growth of the output bucket, especially in environments with repetitive queries such as cost and usage reporting. Many of these files are transient and provide little value once the query is consumed. Without lifecycle rules, organizations pay for unnecessary storage and create clutter in S3.

There are no inefficiency matches the current filters.